Re: Same query taking less time in low configuration machine - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Philip Semanchuk
Subject Re: Same query taking less time in low configuration machine
Date
Msg-id 5BCF8F9B-30A5-44AB-80C2-8C23424C38B2@americanefficient.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Same query taking less time in low configuration machine  (Vishwa Kalyankar <vishwakalyankar8@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Same query taking less time in low configuration machine
List pgsql-general

> On Jul 14, 2020, at 5:27 AM, Vishwa Kalyankar <vishwakalyankar8@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have two machines - one with 8GB RAM & 4core CPU and the other with 64GB Ram & 24 core CPU.  Both machines have the
sameDB (Postgres 12 + Postgis 2.5.3).  Same query is taking less time in low end machine whereas more time in high end
machine. Any thoughts on where to look?  I have tuned the db in both machines according to
https://pgtune.leopard.in.ua/#/ 
>
>
> Below I am pasting the output of query explain in both the machines.
>
>  -bash-4.2$ psql -p 5434
> psql (12.3)
> Type "help" for help.
>
> postgres=# \c IPDS_KSEB;
> You are now connected to database "IPDS_KSEB" as user "postgres".
> IPDS_KSEB=# explain analyze select * from
kseb_geometry_trace_with_barrier_partition(5,'kottarakara_version',437,'htline',2); 
>                                                                        QUERY PLAN
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Function Scan on kseb_geometry_trace_with_barrier_partition  (cost=0.25..10.25 rows=1000 width=169) (actual
time=11626.548..11626.568rows=254 loops=1) 
>  Planning Time: 0.212 ms
>  Execution Time: 11628.590 ms
>
>
> -bash-4.2$ psql -p 5422
> psql (12.3)
> Type "help" for help.
>
> postgres=# \c IPDS_KSEB;
> You are now connected to database "IPDS_KSEB" as user "postgres".
> IPDS_KSEB=# explain analyze select * from
kseb_geometry_trace_with_barrier_partition(5,'kottarakara_version',437,'htline',2); 
>                                                                        QUERY PLAN
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Function Scan on kseb_geometry_trace_with_barrier_partition  (cost=0.25..10.25 rows=1000 width=169) (actual
time=22304.425..22304.448rows=254 loops=1) 
>  Planning Time: 0.219 ms
>  Execution Time: 22352.219 ms
> (3 rows)
>

Hi Vishwa,
Is it possible that your data is in the cache on the low end machine but not on the high end machine? There’s both the
Postgrescache and the OS disk cache to consider. You can see what’s in the Postgres cache with an extension like
pg_buffercache.I don’t know of a way to see what’s in the OS cache; maybe others do. 

Cheers
Philip









pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Shantanu Shekhar
Date:
Subject: JDBC driver version for a given Postgres version
Next
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC driver version for a given Postgres version