Hi Ashutosh,
(2018/03/08 14:24), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Etsuro said [2] that WCO constraints can not be implemented on foreign
> server and normal check constraints can be, and for that he provides
> an example in [3]. But I think that example is going the wrong
> direction.
More precisely, what I'm saying there is: for WCO constraints created by
an auto-updatable view over a foreign table, we cannot always implement
constraints on the remote side that match with those WCO constraints.
> For local constraints to be enforced, we use remote
> constraints. For local WCO we need to use remote WCO. That means we
> create many foreign tables pointing to same local table on the foreign
> server through many views, but it's not impossible.
Maybe I don't understand this correctly, but I guess that it would be
the user's responsibility to not create foreign tables in such a way.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
