Re: list partition constraint shape - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: list partition constraint shape
Date
Msg-id 5A6B1FBE.6020102@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: list partition constraint shape  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: list partition constraint shape
List pgsql-hackers
(2018/01/26 10:15), Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/01/25 21:17, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> Some minor comments:
>>
>> +                   /*
>> +                    * Construct an ArrayExpr for the non-null partition
>> +                    * values
>> +                    */
>> +                   arrexpr = makeNode(ArrayExpr);
>> +                   arrexpr->array_typeid =
>> +                                   !type_is_array(key->parttypid[0])
>> +                                       ? get_array_type(key->parttypid[0])
>> +                                       : key->parttypid[0];
>>
>> We test the type_is_array() above in this bit, so I don't think we need to
>> test that again here.
>
> Ah, you're right.  Fixed.

Thanks.  I think the updated version is fine, but I think we can 
simplify the change in this part a bit further, so I modified your 
patch.  I also adjusted some comments in that change a little bit. 
Attached is a modified version of the patch.  What do you think about 
that?  Please let me know.  If that is okay, I'll mark this as Ready for 
Committer.

> Attached updated patch.  Thanks again.

Thanks for updating the patch!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yugo Nagata
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: pg_(total_)relation_size andpartitioned tables