Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Date
Msg-id 59b88df7-01f8-03ca-a212-2de7ade9ca34@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/24/17 12:30 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> In any case, we can't just build x86-64 packages with compile-time
> SSE4.1 checks.

Dumb question... since we're already discussing llvm for the executor, 
would that potentially be an option here? AIUI that also opens the 
possibility of using the GPU as well.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] btree_gin and btree_gist for enums