Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ben Zeev, Lior
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture
Date
Msg-id 59E5FDBE8F3B144F8FCF35819B39DD4C16243123@G6W2498.americas.hpqcorp.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture  (Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Atri,

But TOAST only occur if the tuple size exceed 2KB, doesn't it?

Lior


-----Original Message-----
From: Atri Sharma [mailto:atri.jiit@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 15:39
To: Ben Zeev, Lior
Cc: Stephen Frost; Pg Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Process memory architecture

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Ben Zeev, Lior <lior.ben-zeev@hp.com> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> The case which I'm seeing is that I have an empty table without any
> rows, Create table test (
>   Num Integer,
>   C1 character varying(512),
>   C2 character varying(512),
>   C3 character varying(512));
>
> I create several partial indexes on this table:
>
> Create index(index_1_c1) on test(c1) where Num=1; Create
> index(index_2_c1) on test(c1) where Num=2; Create index(index_1_c2) on
> test(c1) where Num=1; Create index(index_2_c2) on test(c1) where
> Num=2;


It is just a hunch, but all of your attributes are character varying.
Could TOAST be an issue here?

Regards,

Atri


--
Regards,

Atri
l'apprenant



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Atri Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Process memory architecture