Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed
Date
Msg-id 5947.1232306663@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: libpq WSACleanup is not needed  (Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Yeah. So the question is, do we want to bite the bullet and create
> init() and uninit() functions for libpq?

I think if calling them is an optimization that improves performance
(by eliminating per-connection-start overhead), this could fly.  If
the plan is "we are going to require applications to call these
or they'll break", it's not going to be acceptable ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixes for compiler warnings
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixes for compiler warnings