Re: SQL-standard function body - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SQL-standard function body
Date
Msg-id 582467.1593612850@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL-standard function body  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: SQL-standard function body
Re: SQL-standard function body
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> In my experience, there's certainly demand for some kind of mode where
> plpgsql functions get checked at function definition time, rather than
> at execution time.

Yeah, absolutely agreed.  But I'm afraid this proposal takes us too
far in the other direction: with this, you *must* have a 100% parseable
and semantically valid function body, every time all the time.

So far as plpgsql is concerned, I could see extending the validator
to run parse analysis (not just raw parsing) on all SQL statements in
the body.  This wouldn't happen of course with check_function_bodies off,
so it wouldn't affect dump/reload.  But likely there would still be
demand for more fine-grained control over it ... or maybe it could
stop doing analysis as soon as it finds a DDL command?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body