Re: How come drongo didn't fail authentication here? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: How come drongo didn't fail authentication here?
Date
Msg-id 57fcee8a-f8d1-f719-3213-37462e341cde@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How come drongo didn't fail authentication here?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-07-28 Th 10:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 2022-07-28 Th 10:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> How can that be?  Have we somehow broken SSPI authentication
>>> in HEAD?
>> Nothing is broken. On HEAD drongo uses Unix sockets.
> I see.  Seems like we've created a gotcha for ourselves:
> a test script can look perfectly fine in Unix-based testing,
> and even in Windows CI, and then fail when it hits the back
> branches in the buildfarm.  Is it worth doing something to
> cause the lack of a valid auth_extra spec to fail on Unix?
>
>             


Maybe we should just have a windows testing instance that doesn't use
Unix sockets at all.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: make update-po@master stops at pg_upgrade
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: make update-po@master stops at pg_upgrade