On Feb 15, 2007, at 22:35 , Richard Huxton wrote:
> Walter Cruz wrote:
>> SELECT distinct name from test order by number
>> (well, I think that que query doesn't make any sense, but raises
>> the error :) )
>> The error: ERROR: for SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions must
>> appear in select list is due to a standart implementarion or a design
>> decision of postgres?
>
> I think ORDER BY is defined to take place after DISTINCT, which
> means there is no meaningful "number" for it to order by. You could
> arbitrarily choose the first number encountered, but I can't see
> what sense it would make to order by them.
I believe the reason is that DISTINCT depends on a sort to determine
uniqueness (distinctness), so it's a implementation detail that if
you're going to include an ORDER BY, you also need to include the
same columns in the ORDER BY in the DISTINCT clause. Though I suspect
Richard is right that ORDER BY takes place after DISTINCT. (My
cursory attempt at parsing the SQL 2003 draft failed me.)
On further thought, I bet
SELECT DISTINCT name
FROM test
ORDER BY name, number
fails with a different error, one directly supporting Richard's
conclusion.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
