> On Mar 17, 2022, at 9:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> not just in terms of telling other people how they have to write
> their patches.
...
> the burden of maintaining relatively little-used features
> should fall entirely on people who don't care about them.
Joshua helped test the DAC portion of this patch, and answered a number of my questions on the topic, including
in-personback in December. I take your point, Robert, on the general principle, but the archives should reflect that
Joshuadid contribute to this specific patch.
Joshua, should we drop the DAC portion for postgres 15 and revisit the issue for postgres 16? I think it's getting
latein the development cycle to attempt what Tom described upthread, and I'd hate to see the rest of this patch punted.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
