Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers
Date
Msg-id 575.1159063236@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>)
Responses Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> writes:
> The check looks good - are we chasing up the Linux kernel (or Suse) guys 
> to get the bug investigated?

I asked around inside Red Hat but haven't gotten any responses yet ...
seeing that it's a rather old Suse kernel, I can understand that RH's
kernel hackers might not be too excited about investigating.  (Alan Cox,
for one, has got other things to worry about this weekend:
http://zeniv.linux.org.uk/%7etelsa/boom/

I believe Dan's busy updating his kernel --- if a current Suse kernel
still shows the problem then he should definitely file a bug with them.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 w/ VALUES
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 Now Available