Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers
Date
Msg-id 4515F8D8.9090005@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz> writes:
>> The check looks good - are we chasing up the Linux kernel (or Suse) guys 
>> to get the bug investigated?
> 
> I asked around inside Red Hat but haven't gotten any responses yet ...
> seeing that it's a rather old Suse kernel, I can understand that RH's
> kernel hackers might not be too excited about investigating.  (Alan Cox,
> for one, has got other things to worry about this weekend:
> http://zeniv.linux.org.uk/%7etelsa/boom/

Uhmm... doh?

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> I believe Dan's busy updating his kernel --- if a current Suse kernel
> still shows the problem then he should definitely file a bug with them.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Buildfarm alarms
Next
From: "Jie Zhang"
Date:
Subject: Re: Bitmap index status