On 2016/04/08 13:42, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:22:03PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> On 2016/04/04 20:35, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Etsuro Fujita
>>> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>>> Here is a patch to fix this issue. As proposed by Michael, I modified
>>>> execute_dml_stmt so that it uses PQsendQueryParams, not PQexecParams. Any
>>>> comments are welcome.
>>> + * This is based on pqSocketCheck.
>>> + */
>>> + bool
>>> + CheckSocket(PGconn *conn)
>>> + {
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + Assert(conn != NULL);
>>> Instead of copying again pqSocketQuery, which is as well copied in
>>> libpqwalreceiver.c, wouldn't it be better to use WaitLatchOrSocket
>>> with the socket returned by PQsocket?
>> Will check. Thanks for the comment!
> What do you think? This open item's seven-day deadline has passed. It would
> help keep things moving to know whether you consider your latest patch optimal
> or whether you wish to change it the way Michael described.
I wish to change it that way because it not only avoids the duplicate
but fixes a bug in the previous patch that I overlooked that there is a
race condition if a signal arrives just before entering the CheckSocket.
Attached is an updated version of the patch.
Sorry for the delay.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
