On 06/04/16 06:13, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
>
> On 6 April 2016 at 03:29, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net
> <mailto:andrew@dunslane.net>> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, keeping it but rejecting update of an existing key is my
> preference too.
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> Yes, it sounds quite reasonable. Here is a new version of patch (it will
> throw
> an error for an existing key). Is it better now?
This seems like reasonable compromise to me. I wonder if the errcode
should be ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE but don't feel too strongly
about that.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services