Re: FSM corruption leading to errors - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: FSM corruption leading to errors
Date
Msg-id 56ea6b2f-cad2-56ce-5785-c6415c422e34@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FSM corruption leading to errors  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: FSM corruption leading to errors  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/20/16 10:15 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> 2) If anything is found, stop the server and delete the files manually.
> 3) Re-start the server.
> OK, that's troublesome and costly for large relations, but we know
> that's the safest way to go for any versions, and there is no need to
> complicate the code with any one-time repairing extensions.

Wouldn't you need to run around to all your replicas and do that as well?

> Speaking of which, I implemented a small extension able to truncate
> the FSM up to the size of the relation as attached, but as I looked at
> it SMGR_TRUNCATE_FSM has been introduced in 9.6 so its range of action
> is rather limited... And I pushed as well a version on github:
> https://github.com/michaelpq/pg_plugins/tree/master/pg_fix_truncation
> The limitation range of such an extension is a argument good enough to
> just rely on the stop/delete-FSM/start method to fix an instance and
> let VACUUM do the rest of the work. That looks to work but use it at
> your own risk.

Shouldn't the truncation be logged before it's performed?
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)   mobile: 512-569-9461



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Sven R. Kunze"
Date:
Subject: Re: Indirect indexes
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove autovacuum GUC?