On 11/03/2016 11:45, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> Coming back to the previous discussions about random() - AFAICT this
> patch will introduce the random() call always (in explain_ExecutorStart):
>
> +if (auto_explain_log_min_duration >= 0 && nesting_level == 0)
> +current_query_sampled = (random() < auto_explain_sample_ratio *
> +MAX_RANDOM_VALUE);
>
>
> Not sure what the overhead is, but wouldn't it be better to include a
> check for current_query_sampled>0 in the if part of that statement?
> Regardless of performance, that feels cleaner to me. Or am I missing
> something?
You mean check for auto_explain_sample_ratio > 0 ?
There would be a corner case if a query is sampled
(current_query_sampled is true) and then auto_explain_sample_ratio is
set to 0, all subsequent queries in this backend would be processed.
We could add a specific test for this case to spare a random() call, but
I fear it'd be overkill. Maybe it's better to document that the good way
to deactivate auto_explain is to set auto_explain.log_min_duration to -1.
--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
