Re: Obtaining hundredths of a second data from time data types - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: Obtaining hundredths of a second data from time data types
Date
Msg-id 56DA0639.8050006@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Obtaining hundredths of a second data from time data types  (Scott Ferrett <scott@ferrettconsulting.com>)
Responses Re: Obtaining hundredths of a second data from time data types  (Scott Ferrett <scott@ferrettconsulting.com>)
List pgsql-odbc
On 03/04/2016 01:20 PM, Scott Ferrett wrote:
> Here is a screen shot from ODBCTest after Issuing "SELECT ts, t FROM
> TestTable" and binding an SQL_C_TYPE_TIMESTAMP to each of the two columns:
>
>
>
> As you can see, the timestamp has the hundredths part filled in where as
> the time part does not.
>
> I also tried binding to SQL_C_CHAR as a work-around.  But this made no
> difference, producing:
>
>
>
> This is the result of the same select statement run from pgAdmin III
> showing that there the hundredths part is returned for both fields:
>
>

Looks like this is the reason:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms712436%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

The identifier for the time ODBC SQL data type is:

SQL_TYPE_TIME

to

SQL_C_TYPE_TIMESTAMP None[b] Data[c] 16[d]

[c]   The date fields of the timestamp structure are set to the current
date, and the fractional seconds field of the timestamp structure is set
to zero.


>
>
> Cheers,
>   Scott
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Obtaining hundredths of a second data from time data types
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Obtaining hundredths of a second data from time data types