Clock with Adaptive Replacement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Konstantin Knizhnik
Subject Clock with Adaptive Replacement
Date
Msg-id 56BCF6FD.3030602@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Clock with Adaptive Replacement
Re: [HACKERS] Clock with Adaptive Replacement
List pgsql-hackers
Hi hackers,

What do you think about improving cache replacement clock-sweep algorithm in PostgreSQL with adaptive version proposed
inthis article:
 
    http://www-cs.stanford.edu/~sbansal/pubs/fast04.pdf

Are there some well known drawbacks of this approach or it will be interesting to adopt this algorithm to PostgreSQL
andmeasure it impact om performance under different workloads?
 
I find this ten years old thread:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/d2jkde$6bg$1@sea.gmane.org#d2jkde$6bg$1@sea.gmane.org

but it mostly discus possible patent issues with another algorithm ARC (CAR is inspired by ARC,  but it is different
algorithm).
As far as I know there are several problems with current clock-sweep algorithm in PostgreSQL, especially for very large
caches.
May be CAR can address some of them?

-- 
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Add schema-qualified relnames in constraint error messages.