Some inconsistency (if we believe that omitted lower bound is equal to 1):
regression=# insert into arrtest_s values
('[-1:9]={3,1,4,1,5,9,5,6,7,8,9}'::int[], null);
INSERT 0 1
regression=# UPDATE arrtest_s SET a[:2] = '{23, 24, 25}';
ERROR: source array too small
regression=# UPDATE arrtest_s SET a[1:2] = '{23, 24, 25}';
UPDATE 1
Seems, omitting boundaries in insert/update isn't a good idea. I suggest to
allow omitting only in select subscripting.
YUriy Zhuravlev wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 December 2015 15:43:47 you wrote:
>> On Tuesday 01 December 2015 15:30:47 Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>>> As I understand, update should fail with any array, so, first update
>>> should
>>> fail too. Am I right?
>>
>> You right. Done. New patch in attach.
>
> Found error when omitted lower bound in INSERT like this:
> INSERT INTO arrtest_s (a[:2], b[1:2]) VALUES ('{1,2,3,4,5}', '{7,8,9}');
>
> I fix it in new patch. Lower bound for new array is 1 by default.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
