On 19/7/22 20:31, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022, Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> wrote:
Thanks David
Στις 19/7/22 17:19, ο/η David G. Johnston έγραψε:
On Tuesday, July 19, 2022, Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> wrote:
ERROR: cannot convert infinity to numeric
-- has no problem testing against infinity
select it.id ,cept.value::numeric as val, numrange(ceptl.min_alarm::numeric,ceptl.max_alarm::numeric
,'()') as range from items it, cept_report cept , dynacom.vessels vsl, machdefs md, cept_reportlimits ceptl wh
ere it.id=cept.id AND md.defid=ceptl.defid AND it.defid=md.defid AND it.vslwhid=vsl.id AND vsl.vslstatus='Acti
ve' and md.application = 'Critical Equipment Performance Test' AND cept.systemdate>= (now()-'1 year'::interval
) AND cept.value='inf' ORDER BY 1;
id | val | range
----+-----+-------
(0 rows)
The column cept.value contains an infinity. I see nothing unusual in any of these queries given that fact. If you try to cast the infinity to numeric it will fail. If that doesn’t happen the query won’t fail.
Sorry I must have been dizzy today with so much support.
Yep, there are some infinity in there, but not in this result set.
I think when the casting is in the WHERE filter for some reason some subplan uses this filter (and fails). But when this check is applied to the result, no infinity is found and works correctly.
That is what it means for SQL to be a declarative language, the order of execution/evaluation is determined to be efficient and not what is explicitly written. You do have some control though, but using it also means you might make things worse.
I think you have issues anyway if you are doing equality checks on what seems to be a floating point column, regardless of which way you do the cast.
Thank you, will look into it further when I get the time.
David J.
--
Achilleas Mantzios
DBA, Analyst, IT Lead
IT DEPT
Dynacom Tankers Mgmt
