Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> What about defining a PG_TCP_KEEPALIVE instead?
I thought about that, but it would complicate constructing the elog
messages, so I didn't bother. It might be worth working harder if
we ever grow any more alternatives.
> Side note: Windows has something with a different set of options:
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms740476(v=vs.85).aspx
Yeah, the Windows part of that code is a real mess. But it works
as far as I've heard.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
