On 2015-09-03 15:03, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There's no existing precedent for a feature that lets the standby be
>> different from the master *in any way*. So I don't see why we should
>> start here. I think the reasonable definition is that the GUC
>> controls whether the master tries to update the SLRU (and generate
>> appropriate WAL records, presumably). The standby should not get a
>> choice about whether to replay those WAL records.
>
> +1
>
> I added this to the 9.5 open item list.
>
I see I forgot to send patch for this, so here it is. It just removes
the on start check for track_commit_timestamp being same in config and
control file.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services