Re: pg_resetsysid - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: pg_resetsysid
Date
Msg-id 55AA57CE.4020400@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_resetsysid  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: pg_resetsysid
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-07-18 02:29, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/14/15 11:29 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> 0002 - Adds pg_resetsysid utility which changes the system id to newly
>> generated one.
>>
>> 0003 - Adds -s option to pg_resetxlog to change the system id to the one
>> specified - this is separate from the other one as it can be potentially
>> more dangerous.
>
> Adding a new top-level binary creates a lot of maintenance overhead
> (e.g., documentation, man page, translations, packaging), and it seems
> silly to create a new tool whose only purpose is to change one number in
> one file.  If we're going to have this in pg_resetxlog anyway, why not
> create another option letter to assigns a generated ID?  As the
> documentation says, resetting the system ID clears the WAL, so it's not
> like this is a completely danger-free situation.
>

Well, last time I submitted this I did it exactly as you propose but 
there was long discussion about this changing the target audience of 
pg_resetxlog and that it would be better as separate binary from 
pg_resetxlog.

It might more future proof to have more generic binary which can do all 
the less dangerous work that pg_resetxlog does (which currently is 
probably only -c and the newly proposed -s). Something like 
pg_setcontroldata but that's too long.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL test/verification tool
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: BRIN index and aborted transaction