On 7/3/15 2:33 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 07/03/2015 01:20 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>> Is there a way to determine the operator that resulted in calling the
>> operator function? I thought fcinfo->flinfo->fn_expr might get set to
>> the OpExpr, but seems it can be a FuncExpr even when called via an
>> operator...
>
> Don't think there is. Why do you need to know?
I'd like to support arbitrary operators in variant. I did initial
testing and it looked like I was getting an OpExpr in fn_expr, but I
think that's because I was using a real table to test with. When I do
something like 'a' < 'b' it looks like the operator gets written out of
the plan. If that's indeed what's happening is there a hook I could use
to change that behavior?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
