On 06/24/2015 11:11 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> Is there a way to implement triConsistent for only some of the strategy
> numbers?
No.
> It looks like I would have to internally re-implement something like
> shimTriConsistentFn for each strategy number for which I don't want to
> implement the ternary system in full. Am I missing a trick?
Hmm. It didn't occur to me that you might want to implement
tri-consistent for some strategy numbers and fall back to the
shim-implementation for others. Do you have a real-world example of
where that'd be useful?
- Heikki
