On 05/18/2015 03:21 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> The only question worth discussing is whether we change the operator to
>> "+" (or, for that matter, something else). I've seen your vote on this,
>> so, does anyone else have an opinion on "+" vs. "||"? Preferably with a
>> justification with some kind of grounding?
> My argument has very good grounding. The "||" UPDATE idiom from hstore
> does not and cannot work in a practical way with jsonb's current ||
> operator (at least for the large majority of use cases). It could, it
> just doesn't. I don't want users to make the same association that I
> did, which, based on the total lack of documentation for the new
> operator, they easily could.
>
So you're arguing that we shouldn't call the operation in question ||
because it's pretty much the same, mutatis mutandis, as the hstore
operation of the same name. You've lost me.
Right now I'm more convinced that I was at the start of this discussion
that we have the name right, and when we get a recursive merge operation
calling it something else will be right too.
I do agree that we need to be clearer in the docs about what the
operation is and is not.
cheers
andrew
