On 3/28/20 5:27 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Hello Tom,
>
> Thanks for your feedback,
>
>>> I'd be rather unclear about what the actual feedback is, though. I'd
>>> interpret it as "pg does not care much about code coverage". Most
>>> clients
>>> are in the red on coverage.postgresql.org. I'd like pgbench at least
>>> to be
>>> in the green, but it does not look that it will ever be the case.
>
>> The reason why the first iteration failed was that it was insufficiently
>> insensitive to timing.
This patch has been marked Returned with Feedback.
If the TAP tests could be made to work without the special exceptions
added to pgbench.c I think this patch would have a better chance.
Regards,
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net
