Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2
Date
Msg-id 5553.1277765656@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> You could argue it either way.  The number of beta testers with
>>> plpython3 installations is probably very small, so I'm kinda leaning to
>>> just changing the code without a catversion bump.  OTOH, if we want to
>>> encourage testing of pg_upgrade ...
>> 
>> FWIW, the last bump has led to a lot of testing of pgupgrade.

> And fixes, that will appear in 9.0 beta3.  :-)  Most fixes were related
> to platform compile portability.

Well, if you think that pg_upgrade has changed materially since beta2,
that would be a good argument for getting some fresh testing for it,
which in turn argues for doing the catversion bump here.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mike Berrow
Date:
Subject: Issue: Deprecation of the XML2 module 'xml_is_well_formed' function
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2