Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2
Date
Msg-id 201006282118.o5SLIUg16409@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> > You could argue it either way.  The number of beta testers with
> > plpython3 installations is probably very small, so I'm kinda leaning to
> > just changing the code without a catversion bump.  OTOH, if we want to
> > encourage testing of pg_upgrade ...
> 
> FWIW, the last bump has led to a lot of testing of pgupgrade.

And fixes, that will appear in 9.0 beta3.  :-)  Most fixes were related
to platform compile portability.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + None of us is going to be here forever. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Admission Control
Next
From: Mike Berrow
Date:
Subject: Issue: Deprecation of the XML2 module 'xml_is_well_formed' function