On 12/2/21 11:00, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 12/1/21 19:30, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
>> On 12/1/21, 10:37 AM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/1/21, 8:27 AM, "David Steele" <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>>>> On 11/30/21 18:31, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
>>>>> Do you think it's still worth trying to make it safe, or do you think
>>>>> we should just remove exclusive mode completely?
>>>> My preference would be to remove it completely, but I haven't gotten a
>>>> lot of traction so far.
>>> In this thread, I count 6 people who seem alright with removing it,
>>> and 2 who might be opposed, although I don't think anyone has
>>> explicitly stated they are against it.
>> I hastily rebased the patch from 2018 and got it building and passing
>> the tests. I'm sure it will need additional changes, but I'll wait
>> for more feedback before I expend too much more effort on this.
>>
>
> Should we really be getting rid of
> PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster::backup_fs_hot() ?
Agreed, it would be better to update backup_fs_hot() to use exclusive
mode and save out backup_label instead.
Regards,
-David
