On 18/04/15 20:35, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> Sorry for late reply. Here is a slightly improved version of the patch
> with the new `h_atoi` function, I hope this implementation will be more
> appropriate.
>
It's better, but a) I don't like the name of the function b) I don't see
why we need the function at all given that it's called from only one
place and is effectively couple lines of code.
In general I wonder if it wouldn't be better to split the replacePath
into 3 functions, one replacePath, one replacePathObject,
replacePathArray and call those Object/Array ones from the replacePath
and inlining the h_atoi code into the Array one. If this was done then
it would make also sense to change the main if/else in replacePath into
a switch.
Another thing I noticed now when reading the code again - you should not
be using braces when you only have one command in the code-block.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
