On 02/23/2015 04:01 PM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
>> I think you could remove renegotiation from PostgreSQL as long as you
>> offer something better than RC4 in the TLS handshake.
>
> I'd say it is best to wait if and how OpenSSL change their API when they
> implement TLS 1.3.
>
> I'd vote against removing renegotiation.
I'm just suggesting that the effort required to fix bugs in this part of
PostgreSQL could be spent better elsewhere.
> If changing the encryption is so useless, whe did the TLS workgroup
> decide to introduce rekeying as a substitute for renegotiation?
Theoretical considerations, mostly. If rekeying is strictly required
after processing just a few petabytes, the cipher is severely broken and
should no longer be used.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
