Re: Postgres architecture for multiple instances - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Samuel Smith
Subject Re: Postgres architecture for multiple instances
Date
Msg-id 54EA9612.80408@net153.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres architecture for multiple instances  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: Postgres architecture for multiple instances
List pgsql-general
On 02/21/2015 05:25 PM, David Steele wrote:
> On 2/21/15 6:08 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>
>> Currently the built in replication solutions work at the cluster level,
>> not at the database level. There are third party tools, Slony and
>> Bucardo come to mind, that can work at a more focused level.
>
> Again, it depends in what kind of access your customers have to the
> database.  Logical backups can be done on a per-database basis (and are
> very practical for small datasets), but physical backups (which are more
> efficient) must backup the entire cluster (except for the third-party
> solutions noted above that have their own challenges).
>
> You said you don't want to give a lot of information, but the optimal
> solution depends on how your customers connect to their database:
>
> 1) Entirely through an application or API
> 2) Directly to the db via psql, PgAdmin, JDBC, etc.
>
> Without that information it's hard to give really solid advice.
>

Sorry, to be more specific our application is on top of a java
framework. Similar to Ruby On Rails. Customers don't interface with the
database at all, only through the website which provides our services.

--Sam


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Eric Hanson
Date:
Subject: express composite type literal as text
Next
From: Gavin Flower
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres architecture for multiple instances