Re: Commitfest problems - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Torsten Zuehlsdorff |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Commitfest problems |
Date | |
Msg-id | 5492CE47.8040701@toco-domains.de Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Commitfest problems (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Responses |
Re: Commitfest problems
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On 17.12.2014 20:00, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Jaime Casanova (jaime@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> It has been proposed that we do a general list of people at the bottom >>> of the release notes who helped review during that cycle. That would >>> be less intrusive and possibly a good idea, but would we credit the >>> people who did a TON of reviewing? Everyone who reviewed even one >>> patch? Somewhere in between? Would committers be excluded because "we >>> just expect them to help" or included because credit is important to >>> established community members too? To what extent would this be >>> duplicative of http://www.postgresql.org/community/contributors/ ? >> >> Not much really, I tried to get my name on that list a couple of years >> ago, when i reviewed more than i do now, and never got it. >> And while my name is in a couple commit messages, that is a lot harder >> to show to people... > > Having your name in a list of other names at the bottom of the release > notes page, without any indication of what you helped with, would work > better? Perhaps it would but I tend to doubt it. Out of my personal experience in Germany: yes, it helps. It is not very logical, but many people need a "simple way" (Website against git log) to "see" something. (I've rarely seen that something like that is considered not trustable even if there are strong indications that its faked.) But i think it is a good point that the release notes should not become to big. >> you know, it's kind of frustrating when some not-yet customers ask for >> certificated engineers, and there isn't any official (as in "from >> community") certificate so you need to prove you're a contributor so >> let's see this random commit messages... > > Another thought I had was to suggest we consider *everyone* to be a > contributor and implement a way to tie together the mailing list > archives with the commit history and perhaps the commitfest app and make > it searchable and indexed on some website. eg: > > contributors.postgresql.org/sfrost > - Recent commits > - Recent commit mentions > - Recent emails to any list > - Recent commitfest app activity > - Recent wiki page updates > ... > > Ideally with a way for individuals to upload a photo, provide a company > link, etc, similar to what the existing Major Contributors have today. > Obviously, this is not a small task to develop and there is some risk of > abuse (which I expect the other folks on the infra team will point out > and likely tar and feather me for suggesting this at all..) but it might > be along the same lines as Bruce's PgLife.. That's an interesting idea. I'm not convinced that this is the best solution, but i would help, if community thinks this should be implemented. Greetings, Torsten
pgsql-hackers by date: