Re: psql \sf doesn't show it's SQL when ECHO_HIDDEN is on - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: psql \sf doesn't show it's SQL when ECHO_HIDDEN is on
Date
Msg-id 546F9746.50701@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql \sf doesn't show it's SQL when ECHO_HIDDEN is on  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/21/2014 02:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Well, now we get things like this:
>>      ERROR:  more than one function named "abc"
>>      LINE 1: SELECT 'abc'::pg_catalog.regproc::pg_catalog.oid
>> whereas minimal_error_message suppressed the second line. If we want to
>> preserve that older behaviour we'll have to abandon use of PSQLexec. But
>> it's not so complex that that would be a huge issue.
> Yeah, the reason why we wrote that code to begin with was that there
> were a bunch of user-facing error cases that would be reported by
> regproc_in/regprocedure_in, and we didn't want to clutter those error
> reports with the underlying queries.
>
> I'm not sure how I feel about changing this.  Making these queries subject
> to ECHO_HIDDEN seems like we're exposing them to users to some extent
> anyway, and maybe it's not worth dozens of lines of code (and duplicating
> large parts of PSQLexec) to avoid the extra output.  On the other hand
> this output doesn't seem very nice from a fit-and-finish standpoint.
>
>             


Let me see what I can come up with.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.5: Better memory accounting, towards memory-bounded HashAgg
Next
From: hubert depesz lubaczewski
Date:
Subject: How to use brin indexes?