On 03/11/14 22:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 11/1/14 8:04 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On second thought, maybe those should be pg_get_transaction_committs,
>> pg_get_transaction_committs_data, etc.
>
> Please don't name anything "committs". That looks like a misspelling of
> something.
>
> There is nothing wrong with
>
> pg_get_transaction_commit_timestamp()
>
> If you want to reduce the length, lose the "get".
>
I am fine with that, I only wonder if your definition of "anything" only
concerns the SQL interfaces or also the internals.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
