Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: how to handle missing "prove" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: how to handle missing "prove"
Date
Msg-id 5457D9F2.6030504@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: how to handle missing "prove"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: how to handle missing "prove"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 11/2/14 11:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Committed patch looks good, but should we also add the stanza we discussed
> in Makefile.global.in concerning defining $(prove) in terms of "missing"
> if we didn't find it?  I think the behavior of HEAD when you ask for
> --enable-tap-tests but don't have "prove" might be less than ideal.

configure will now fail when "prove" is not found.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: add recovery_timeout option to control timeout of restore_command nonzero status code
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: tracking commit timestamps