Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes between pg_dump and pg_dumpall - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes between pg_dump and pg_dumpall
Date
Msg-id 5455.1516726008@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes betweenpg_dump and pg_dumpall  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Oh, I see what you mean.  I was just worried that some code might expect
> template1 to always have an oid of 1, but we can just call that code
> broken.

Ever since we invented template0, it's been possible to drop and recreate
template1, so I'd say any expectation that it must have OID 1 has been
wrong for a long time.  This change will just make the situation more
common.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Add --no-comments to skip COMMENTs with pg_dump
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask