Re: left join with OR optimization - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: left join with OR optimization
Date
Msg-id 5452.1327418861@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to left join with OR optimization  (Sim Zacks <sim@compulab.co.il>)
List pgsql-general
Sim Zacks <sim@compulab.co.il> writes:
> I've seen written that a b-tree index can't be used on a join with an
> OR.

That's not the case ...

> Is there a way to optimize a join so that it can use an index for a
> query such as:

> select
> a.partid,a.duedate,coalesce(a.quantity,0)+sum(coalesce(b.quantity,0))
> from stat_allocated_components a
> left join stat_allocated_components b on a.partid=b.partid and
> b.quantity>0 and
> (a.duedate>b.duedate or (a.duedate=b.duedate and a.popartid>b.popartid))
> where a.quantity>0
> group by a.partid,a.duedate,a.quantity

... but in this example, it would be both more readable and more easily
optimizable if you expressed the duedate/popartid requirement as a row
comparison:

    row(a.duedate, a.popartid) > row(b.duedate, b.popartid)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: left join with OR optimization
Next
From: Chris Angelico
Date:
Subject: Re: Best way to create unique primary keys across schemas?