Re: char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text
Date
Msg-id 54354A73.6030607@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text  (Emi Lu <emilu@encs.concordia.ca>)
Responses Re: char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text
List pgsql-performance
On 10/08/2014 10:22 AM, Emi Lu wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> For performance point of view, are there big differences between:
> char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text?
>
> Some comments from google shows:
> No difference, under the hood it's all varlena. Check this article
> from Depesz:
> http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2010/03/02/charx-vs-varcharx-vs-varchar-vs-text/
> A couple of highlights:
>
>     To sum it all up:
>
>       * char(n) – takes too much space when dealing with values
>         shorter than n, and can lead to subtle errors because of
>         adding trailing spaces, plus it is problematic to change the limit
>       * varchar(n) – it's problematic to change the limit in live
>         environment
>       * varchar – just like text
>       * text – for me a winner – over (n) data types because it lacks
>         their problems, and over varchar – because it has distinct name
>
>     So, can I assume no big performance differences?
>     Thanks alot!
>     Emi
>


Why do you need to ask if you already have the answer? Depesz is right.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Emi Lu
Date:
Subject: char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text
Next
From: Emi Lu
Date:
Subject: Re: char(N), varchar(N), varchar, text