Re: SET CONSTRAINTS not schema-aware - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SET CONSTRAINTS not schema-aware
Date
Msg-id 5416.1052969082@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET CONSTRAINTS not schema-aware  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SET CONSTRAINTS not schema-aware  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> SET CONSTRAINTS still does what it used to do, which is to alter the
>> behavior of all constraints with the given name.  We should probably
>> expand the syntax so that a particular table name can be mentioned.

> Is this a TODO?

Nobody objected to my statement, so I guess so ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SET CONSTRAINTS not schema-aware
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC and postgresql.conf docs