On 02/09/14 11:56, Pavel Stehule wrote:
OK. Thanks for all the info I was missing about this complexity, I see that it goes well beyond the syntax thing.
However, I'd insist that this should be IMHO a big priority, and I'd set it as a long-term goal. Even better if it could have a phased approach, that would make a lot of people happier (targeting the most used functionality). I'm sure pushing us to implement those missing features would also be really good, too.
In the meantime, having another language (probably not plpgsql2) that is modern and appealing to many users would be a very nice win.
Regards,
Álvaro