Re: PL/pgSQL 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date
Msg-id 540535A3.6040009@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PL/pgSQL 2  (David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PL/pgSQL 2
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/02/2014 09:40 AM, David G Johnston wrote:
> Random thought as I wrote that: how about considering how pl/pgsql
> functionality can be generalize so that it is a database API that
> another language can call?  In that way the server would drive the core
> functionality and the language would simply be an interpreter that
> enforces its specific notion of acceptable syntax.

That's pretty much what we already have with the SPI and procedural
language handler infrastructure. PL/Perl, PL/Python, etc exist because
we have this.

What do you see as missing from the current infrastructure? What can't
be done that should be able to be done in those languages?

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sawada Masahiko
Date:
Subject: Re: Concurrently option for reindexdb
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2