On 07/07/2014 11:46 AM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2014-07-07 14:02:15 +0530, amit.khandekar@enterprisedb.com wrote:
>>
>> Other than some minor comments as mentioned below, I don't have any
>> more issues, it looks all good.
>
> Thank you. (Updated patch attached.)
I don't think the new GetBufferWithoutRelcache function is in line with
the existing ReadBuffer API. I think it would be better to add a new
ReadBufferMode - RBM_CACHE_ONLY? - that only returns the buffer if it's
already in cache, and InvalidBuffer otherwise.
- Heikki
