On 08/08/2014 08:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps another options would be a new storage type which basically says
>> "just compress it, no matter what"? We'd be able to make that the
>> default for jsonb columns too, no?
> Meh. We could do that, but it would still require adding arguments to
> toast_compress_datum() that aren't there now. In any case, this is a
> band-aid solution; and as Josh notes, once we ship 9.4 we are going to
> be stuck with jsonb's on-disk representation pretty much forever.
>
Yeah, and almost any other solution is likely to mean non-jsonb users
potentially paying a penalty for fixing this for jsonb. So if we can
adjust the jsonb layout to fix this problem I think we should do so.
cheers
andrew
