On 27/06/14 00:12, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
> Thanks for sharing latest patch.
>
> For me this syntax is limiting the current returning clause
> implementation.
> Because its not allowing the returning PRIMARY KEYS with other
> columns, and
> if user or application require that they need to do RETURNING *. Following
> syntax not working, which i think is very useful in term if someone
> want to use
> returning clause with PRIMARY KEY as well as some other table columns.
>
> INSERT INTO dept VALUES (10,'ACCOUNTING','NEW YORK') returning primary
> key, dname;
>
> I think allowing other columns with PRIMARY KEY would be more useful
> syntax.
> Even in later versions if we want to extend this syntax to return
> UNIQUE KEY,
> SEQUENCE VALUES, etc.. comma separation syntax will be more handy.
>
> Others please share your inputs/thoughts.
>
>
[...]
I agree 100%.
I note that DELETE & INSERT have a RETURNING clause. So the semantics
and syntax should be the same, as much as is practicable.
Cheers,
Gavin
