Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?
Date
Msg-id 53A66B13.2050903@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?  (Matheus de Oliveira <matioli.matheus@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/18/2014 08:00 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> PG would need to enforce that it's only used for temporary objects
> as well, of course..  Or at least, that was my thinking on this.

A way to put UNLOGGED objects in such a space and have them recovered
if they vanish would also be valuable, IMO.

Not necessarily in the same patch, I'd just rather keep it in mind so
any chosen design doesn't preclude adding that later.


- -- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTpmsOAAoJELBXNkqjr+S2SNUH/A1zor2WUbQg3PTyD+6wyxlM
v6iMpH9zaeMWYyavIHM9N8a+h7hl9ajKDPMuK0vYLMs83W88LXI4T/t1iJlgZ3Po
WhyjjdNonChn5v1NEJncb4KgqmRQxyWY43rzgEgofSJQgjFbo8UAwoD8Xa32ghDu
4dx2ijYqYsx/hC1Gb1u/HbQ9rX+OkTA0DwljdUgPqPorW/mn5RVscz9Qo5p/W+XH
tdvpu9CKRi4AFPkshZOij+Mu3My863K1+k7sHUpRcsRGJT/AIO1V0wUQE2PuWTAV
5InU5vw/1C6CsYpH4v++XvpeTOnQ4QrMnllh99UTxV91UXN+jx/ENv1SYhBfYGE=
=JGYF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: new long psql parameter --on-error-stop
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?