Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gavin Flower
Subject Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension
Date
Msg-id 53955CF6.3090107@archidevsys.co.nz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension  (David G Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@dalibo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/06/14 17:47, David G Johnston wrote:
> Ian Barwick wrote
>> Hi,
>>
>> The JDBC API provides the getGeneratedKeys() method as a way of retrieving
>> primary key values without the need to explicitly specify the primary key
>> column(s). This is a widely-used feature, however the implementation has
>> significant
>> performance drawbacks.
>>
>> Currently this feature is implemented in the JDBC driver by appending
>> "RETURNING *" to the supplied statement. However this means all columns of
>> affected rows will be returned to the client, which causes significant
>> performance problems, particularly on wide tables. To mitigate this, it
>> would
>> be desirable to enable the JDBC driver to request only the primary key
>> value(s).
> Seems like a good idea.
>
>
>>       ERROR:  Relation does not have any primary key(s)
> "Relation does not have a primary key."
> or
> "Relation has no primary key." (preferred)
>
> By definition it cannot have more than one so it must have none.
>
> It could have multiple unique constraints but I do not believe they are
> considered if not tagged as primary.
>
> David J.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/RETURNING-PRIMARY-KEY-syntax-extension-tp5806462p5806463.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>From memory all unique keys can be considered 'candidate primary keys', 
but only one can be designated 'the PRIMARY KEY'.

I also like your preferred error message, and to the full extent of my 
decidedly Non-Authority, I hereby authorise it!  :-)


Cheers,
Gavin



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: "RETURNING PRIMARY KEY" syntax extension
Next
From: b8flowerfire
Date:
Subject: why postgresql define NTUP_PER_BUCKET as 10, not other numbers smaller