On 5/27/14, 10:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not terribly happy about pushing such a change post-beta1 either,
> but it's not like this isn't something we've known was needed. Anyway,
> what's the worst case if we find a bug here? Tell people not to use
> uuid-ossp?
Mainly some more discussion time would have been nice. Also, while the
old ossp-based uuid was broken in some cases, it had a well-defined
workaround. The new code introduces a whole new dimension of potential
portability issues.
