Re: json casts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: json casts
Date
Msg-id 538667A9.9050901@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: json casts  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: json casts
List pgsql-hackers
On 05/27/2014 07:25 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 05/27/2014 07:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
>>> * Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote:
>>>> Given that this would be a hard coded behaviour change, is it too
>>>> late to do this for 9.4?
>>> No, for my 2c.
>> If we do it by adding casts then it'd require an initdb, so I'd vote
>> against that for 9.4.  If we just change behavior in json.c then that
>> objection doesn't apply, so I wouldn't complain.
>>
>>
>
>
> I wasn't proposing to add a cast, just to allow users to add one if
> they wanted. But I'm quite happy to go with special-casing timestamps,
> and leave the larger question for another time.
>
>


Here's a draft patch. I'm still checking to see if there are other
places that need to be fixed, but I think this has the main one.

cheers

andrew


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: andres@anarazel.de (Andres Freund)
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE REPLICATION SLOT fails on a timeout
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: replication protocol documentation inconsistencies